Trial, error and knowledge in Rittel and Webber’s “Wicked Problems” and Latour’s Promethean monism

Sérgio Luciano da Silva, Rita Aparecida da Conceição Ribeiro

Resumo


In the essay “‘Wicked Problems’ and ‘Tame Problems’: deconstructing an aporetic dualism in dialogue with Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn” (2024), we proceeded with a critical and deconstructive analysis of the dualist foundation of Horst Rittel and Melvin Webber, established in the article “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning” (1973). The aim was to escape the aporia created by the two authors, when they ontologically distinguished scientific and engineering fields from planning and public policy fields. In the current essay, we synthesize our already established monist thesis for “tame problems” and “wicked problems” and confront it with Bruno Latour’s thesis, also monist, on “matters of fact” and “matters of concern”. Starting from the myth of Prometheus in Plato, we proceeded with a critical analysis of the lecture “A Cautious Prometheus?” (2009), by Latour, exploring the “symbolic forms” of language and myth, by Ernst Cassirer, the concepts of trial and error in Karl Popper and scientific anomalies in Thomas Kuhn. The objective is to make Latourian monism explicit and ratify our own, putting into perspective the nature of knowledge and error in different fields, with special attention to design and science.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


BACHELARD, G. La formation de l’esprit scientifique: contribution à une psychanalyse de la connaissance objective. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1947.

BUCHANAN, R. Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, v. 8, n. 2, p. 5–21, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2023.

BURTT, E. The metaphysical foundations of modern physical science: a historical and critical essay. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company, Inc.,1925.

CASSIRER, E. The philosophy of symbolic forms. Volume 3: The phenomenology of knowledge. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1957.

CATRON, B. On taming wicked problems. Dialogue, v. 3, n. 3, p. 13–16, 1981. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2023.

COYNE, R. Wicked problems revisited. Design Studies, v. 26, n. 1, p. 5-17, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.005. Acesso em: 15 out. 2022.

FLECK, L., 1979. Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

GALLE, P. Philosophy of design: an editorial introduction. Design Studies, Vol. 23, Nº 3, p. 211–218, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00034-5. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2023.

GALLE, P. Philosophy of design: an introduction. Researchgate.net, 2007. Disponível em:

design_an_introduction> Acesso em: 19 mar. 2022.

KOYRÉ, A. From the closed world to the infinite universe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1957.

KUHN, T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, Second Edition, 1970.

LATOUR, B. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.

LATOUR, B. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes: essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte, 1991.

LATOUR, B. Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, Vol. 30, Nº 2, p. 225-248, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/421123. Acesso em 12 ago. 2023.

LATOUR, B. A Cautious Prometheus? A few steps toward a philosophy of design (with special attention to Peter Sloterdijk). In: Hackne, F.; Glynne, J.; Minto, V. (eds.). Proceedings of the 2008 Annual International Conference of the Design History Society. Falmouth, 3-6 September 2009, e-books, Universal Publishers, pp. 2-10.

LEVIN, K. et al. Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45, p. 123–152, 2012. Acesso em 12 ago. 2023.

MUSSA, A. A origem da espécie: O roubo do fogo e a noção de humanidade. Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo: Editora Record, 2021.

NEWTON, I. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translation: I. Bernard Cohen; Anne Whitman assisted by Julia Budenz. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1999.

PLATO. Complete works. Edited, with Introduction and Notes, by John M. Cooper. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1997.

POPPER, K. The Logic of the Social Sciences. In: Adorno T. et al. The positivist dispute in German sociology. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd., 1976.

POPPER, K. The logic of scientific discovery. London and New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.

PORTA, M. Hermenéutica de una filosofia de las formas simbólicas. Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN), v. 17, n. 27, p. 219-241, 2010. Disponível em: Acesso em 19 mar. 2022.

PORTA, M. Estudos Neokantianos. São Paulo: Edições Loyola Jesuítas, 2011.

RITTEL, H.; WEBBER, M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169 (1973). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2022.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35522/eed.v32i3.2027

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Direitos autorais 2024 Sérgio Luciano da Silva, Rita Aparecida da Conceição Ribeiro

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição - NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.

Revista Estudos em Design, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, ISSN Impresso: 0104-4249, ISSN Eletrônico: 1983-196X

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.