Design e Tecnologia Assistiva: uma revisão sistemática de modelos de auxílio à prática projetual de dispositivos assistivos

Rosimeri Franck Pichler, Giselle S. A. D. Merino

Abstract


Tendo em vista a contribuição do design para a redução das taxas de abandono de Tecnologias Assistivas (TA) e a consideração do usuário no processo de desenvolvimento, este artigo tem como objetivo identificar os principais modelos de auxílio ao processo de desenvolvimento de TA, por meio de uma revisão sistemática nas bases de dados Scopus e Web of Knowledge. Com um portfólio de 30 artigos diretamente relacionados ao tema, foram realizadas análises bibliométrica e de conteúdo. Foram analisados 27 modelos distintos e observados: A Engenharia como principal área; EUA e Reino Unido como países mais recorrentes, maioria dos modelos destinados à fase de pós-desenvolvimento (avaliação e seleção), preocupação com a inserção do usuário em todo o processo de desenvolvimento e a referência aos modelos HAAT (Human Activity Assistive Technology), o ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) e o MPT (Matching Person and Technology). Este levantamento permitiu a identificação de lacunas e o incentivo para futuros estudos envolvendo o design de dispositivos assistivos.

References


ABASCAL, J. et al. USERfit Tool. A Tool to Facilitate Design for All. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, v. 26, n, 15, p. 141-152, 2003.

ARTHANAT, S. et al. Conceptualization and measurement of assistive technology usability. Disability and Rehabilitation, v.2, n.4, p.235-248, 2007.

ARTHANAT, S. et al. Measuring usability of assistive Technology from a multicontextual perspective: The case of power wheelchairs. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, v. 63, n. 6, p. 751-764, 2009.

ARTHANAT, S.; LESNER, K.; SUNDAR, V. An evaluation framework to measure usability of Assistive Technology at workplace: A demonstration study. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, v. 44, n. 2, p. 213-226, 2016.

BETTONI, Elisa; et al. A systematic review of questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction with limb orthoses. Prosthetics and orthotics international, v. 40, n. 2, 2016, p.158-169.

BLASCO, R. et al. Needs identification methodology for inclusive design. Behaviour & Information Technology, v.35, n.4, p.304-318, 2016.

BOTTE-LECOCQ, C. et al. Considering human factors in BCI experiments: A global approach. Journal Europeen des Systemes Automatises, v.48, n.4-6, p.283-301, 2014.

BRASIL. Subsecretaria Nacional de Promoção dos Direitos da Pessoa com Deficiência. Comitê de Ajudas Técnicas. Tecnologia Assistiva. Brasília: CORDE, 2009, p. 138.

BRASIL. Lei Brasileira de Inclusão da Pessoa com Deficiência (Estatuto da Pessoa com Deficiência). Lei n° 13.146. Brasília. 2015.

BROWN, D. J. et al. Inclusive design for disability: A prototype switch for use in virtual learning environments. Journal of Endocrine Genetics, v.4, n.2, p.103-119, 2005.

BRYCE, T. N.; DIJKERS, M. P.; KOZLOWSKI, A. J. Framework for Assessment of the Usability of Lower-Extremity Robotic Exoskeletal Orthoses. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, v.94, n.11, p.1000-1014, 2015.

CAMBIAGHI, Silvana. Desenho Universal: métodos e técnicas para arquitetos e urbanistas. São Paulo: Senac, 2012.

CHAU, T.; MOGHIMI, S.; POPOVIC, M. R. Knowledge translation in rehabilitation engineering research and development: A knowledge ecosystem framework. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, v.94, n.1, p. 9-19, 2013.

CLARKSON, P.J.; COLEMAN, R. History of Inclusive Design in the UK, Applied Ergonomics, v. 46, p. 235-247, 2015.

COOK, Albert M.; HUSSEY, Susan M. Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby, 1995.

COOK, Albert M.; POLGAR, Janice M. Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice. 4º ed. Mossouri: Elsevier, 2015.

COLEMAN, Roger; et al. What is inclusive design. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 26 ago. 2014.

CRESWELL, John W. Research Design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 4ª ed. Estados Unidos: SAGE Publications, 2014.

CUD. Center for Universal Design. A guide to evaluating the universal design performance of products. N. C. State University. 1997. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 12 mar. 2015.

DA COSTA, Celso R. et al. Dispositivos de tecnologia assistiva: fatores relacionados ao abandono. Cadernos de Terapia Ocupacional, v. 23, n. 3, 2015, p. 611-624.

DAVIES, Claire; et al. Enabling self-directed computer use for individuals with cerebral palsy: a systematic review of assistive devices and Technologies. Developmental medicine and child neurology, v. 52, n. 6, 2010, p. 510-516.

DAY, Hy; JUTAI, Jeffrey. Measuring the Psychosocial Impacto of Assistive Devices: the PIADS. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, v. 9, n. 2, 1996, p. 159-168.

DE COUVREUR, L.; GOOSSENS, R. Design for (every)one: Co-creation as a bridge between universal design and rehabilitation engineering. CoDesign, v.7, n.2, p.107-121, 2011.

DE FARIA BORGES, L. C. L. et al. The life cycle of a customized communication device for a child with cerebral palsy: contributions toward the PD4CAT method. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, v.20, n.1, p.1-23, 2014.

DEMERS, Louise; WEISS-LAMBROU, Rhoda; SKA, Bernadette. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recente progress. Technology and Disability, v.14, 2002, p. 101-105.

EGHDAM, Aboozar; et al. Information and Communication Technology to Support Self-Management of Patients with Mild Acquired Cognitive Impairments: Systematic Review. Journal of medical internet research, v. 14, n. 6, 2012, p. 4-16.

ELSAESSER, L. J.; BAUER, S. Integrating medical, assistive, and universal design products and technologies: Assistive Technology Service Method (ATSM). Disability and Rehabilitation, v.7, n.4, p.282-286, 2012.

FARIAS, Norma; BUCHALLA, Cassia M. A Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde da Organização Mundial da Saúde: Conceitos, Usos e Perspectivas. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol., v. 8, n. 2, 2005, p. 187-193.

FEDERICI, S.; SCHERER, M. J. Assistive Technology Assessment Handbook. Florida: CRC Press, 2012.

FEDERICI, S.; SCHERER, M. J.; BORSCI, S. An ideal model of an assistive technology assessment and delivery process. Technology and Disability, v.26, n.1, p.27-38, 2014.

FERENHOF, Helio; FERNANDES, Roberto. Passo-a-passo para construção da Revisão Sistemática e Bibliometria Utilizando a ferramenta Endnote®. Florianópolis: IGCI, 2016.

FUHRER, M. J. et al. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disability and rehabilitation, v.25, n.22, p.1243-1251, 2003.

GIACOMIN, Joseph. What is Human Centred Design? Anais de evento: 10º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design, São Luiz, Maranhão, Brasil, 2012.

GILLESPIE, Alex; BEST, Catherine; O’NEILL, Brian. Cognitive Function and Assistive Technology for Cognition: A Systematic Review. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, v. 18, n. 1, 2012, p. 1-19.

GRAY, David; COOK, Albert. Assistive Technology. Encyclopedia Britannica, 2013. Disponível em:

collegiate/article/604944>. Acesso em: 20 de out. 2016.

GREEN, M. G. et al. Design for frontier contexts: Classroom assessment of a new design methodology with humanitarian applications. International Journal of Engineering Education, v.25, n.5, p.1029-1045, 2009.

GREENHALGH, Trisha; et al. What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services. BMC Medicine, p. 1-15, 2015.

HERON, Nicola. M; TINDALE, Wendy. B. Healthcare technology co-operatives: Innovative about innovation. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, v. 39, n. 7, p. 378-381, 2015.

HERSH, M. A.; JOHNSON, M. A. On modelling assistive technology systems - Part I: Modelling framework. Technology and Disability, v. 20, n. 3, p. 193-215, 2008a.

______. On modelling assistive technology systems - Part 2: Applications of the comprehensive assistive technology model. Technology and Disability, v. 20, n. 4, p. 251-270, 2008b.

ICSID. International Council of Societies of Industrial Design. Definition of Industrial Design. Disponível em: < http://www.icsid.org/about/definition/ >. Acesso em: 23 out. 2016.

IDEO. Home. Disponível em: < http://www.ideo.org/>. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2016.

ISO 9241, Parte 210. Projeto centrado no ser humano para sistemas interativos. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. ABNT, 2011.

JUTAI, Jeffrey; DAY, Hy. Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Technology and Disability, v. 14, 2002, p. 107-111.

KAKLANIS, N. et al. Virtual user models for the elderly and disabled for automatic simulated accessibility and ergonomy evaluation of designs. Universal Access in the Information Society, v.12, n.4, p.403-425, 2013.

LANE, J. P. The Need to Knowledge Model: An operational framework for knowledge translation and technology transfer. Technology and Disability, v.24, n.3, p.187-192, 2012.

MAGNIER, C.; THOMANN, G.; VILLENEUVE, F.; ZWOLINSKI, P. Methods or designing assistive devices extracted from 16 case studies in the literature. V. 6, 2012, p. 93-100.

MERINO, G. S. A. D; PICHLER, R. F.; HINNIG, R.; DOMENECH, S. C.; MERINO, E. A. D. GODP – Metodologia de projeto centrado no usuário: multicasos de projetos de Tecnologia Assistiva na Terapia Ocupacional. Anais do 1° CBTA (Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Tecnologia Assistiva: Engenharia e Design. Curitiba: Setor de Tecnologia da UFPR, 2016. ISBN: 978-85-5780-004-5.

MORTENSON, W. B. et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of the caregiver assistive technology outcome measure. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, v.47, n.5, p.412-418, 2015.

MPT Institute (Matching Person and Technology). MPT Purpose and description. Disponível em: < http://www.matchingpersonandtechnology.com/purpose.html>. Acesso em: 02 jul. 2016.

OZENC, F. K. Modes of Transitions: Designing Interactive Products for Harmony and Well-being. Design Issues, v. 30, n. 2, p. 30-41, 2014.

PLOS, O. et al. A Universalist strategy for the design of Assistive Technology. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, v. 42, n. 6, p. 533-541, 2012.

PORTO, C. F.; REZENDE, E. J. C. Terceira idade, design universal e aging-in-place. Revista Estudos em Design, v. 24, n. 1, p. 152-168, 2016. Disponível em:

RYAN, S. E.; KLEJMAN, S.; GIBSON, B. E. Measurement of the product attitudes of youth during the selection of assistive technology devices. Disability and Rehabilitation, v. 8, n. 1, p. 21-29, 2013.

SCHERER, M. et al. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disability and Rehabilitation, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1-8, 2007.

SMITH-JACKSON, T. L.; NUSSBAUM, M. A.; MOONEY, A. M. Accessible cell phone design: Development and application of a needs analysis framework. Disability and Rehabilitation, v. 25, n. 10, p. 549-560, 2003.

SOMMERVILLE, I.; DEWSBURY, G. Dependable domestic systems design: A socio-technical approach. Interacting with Computers, v. 19, n. 4, p. 438-456, 2007.

SPAN, Marijke; et al. Involving people with dementia in the development of supportive IT applications: A systematic review. Ageing Research Reviews, v.12, n.2, 2013, pp.535-551

STEEL, E.; GELDERBLOM, G. J.; DE WITTE, L. P. Development of an at selection tool using the ICF model. Technology and Disability, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1-6, 2011.

TEIXEIRA, E. S. M.; OKIMOTO, M. L. L.R.; HEEMANN, A. Design Universal para Inclusão de Pessoas com Deficiência em Linhas de Produção Industriais: análise estruturada de publicações. Revista Estudos em Design, v. 23, n. 2, p. 133-149, 2015. Disponível em:

VERNARDAKIS, N.; STEPHANIDIS, C.; AKOUMIANAKIS, D. Rehabilitation technology product taxonomy: A conceptual tool for analysing products and extracting demand determinants. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, v. 17, n. 3, p. 201-214, 1994.

WALLER, Sam; CLARKSON, John. Inclusive design toolkit: Framework. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 26 ago. 2015.

WANG, C. H.; CHEN, R. C. C. A MPCDM-enabled product concept design via user involvement approach. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, v. 19, n. 1, p. 19-34, 2011.

WHO. Relatório mundial sobre a deficiência. SEDPcD. São Paulo, p.334. 2012

______. How to use the ICF: A practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Exposure draft for comment. Geneva: WHO, 2013.

______. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disponível em: < http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/>. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2016.

______. Priority Assistive Products List. Suiça: World Health Organization, 2016b.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35522/eed.v25i2.483

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Rosimeri Franck Pichler, Giselle S. A. D. Merino

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Revista Estudos em Design, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, ISSN Impresso: 0104-4249, ISSN Eletrônico: 1983-196X

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.