Inside here: daydreaming space and the digital monument

Karen Bosy

Abstract


This paper starts by considering the theories of Henri Lefebvre and Rosalind Krauss to outline an understanding of monumentality, drawing on the theories of the well-respected geographer and theorist Doreen Massey, which support the importance of understanding the relationality of site.  Following on from this, the role of the monument, and the monument’s connection to  imagination and daydreaming, in art practice is explored.  Strategies including Modernist reductionism and unmonumental/anti-monumental art practice are exemplified by artists’ works explicitly concerned with the ‘monument’ and the ‘monumental’, and the questions these works raise are discussed with respect to my own documentarist art practice as represented by artworks included in the Intentions exhibition in 2017: the zine what is public space?, 2017, the moving image artwork, vault, 2017, and collaborative sound artwork Script, 2017.

 

Key-words: daydreaming, imagination, art practice, monument, relational space


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arendt, H. The Human Condition. 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 1998. (First published: 1958.)

Bachelard, G.; Jolas M.; Gilson E. The Poetics of Space=La Poetiquede l’espace. Beacon Press. Boston. 1994 (first published: Presses Universitaires de France. France. 1957.)

Bishop, Claire. “Black Box, White Cube, Public Space. Published in “Out of Time: Preliminary Materials for Skulptur Projekte 2017.” Biennial Foundation, August 28, 2016. http://www.biennialfoundation.org/2016/08/time-preliminary-materials-skulptur-projekte-2017/.

Bosy, K. 2017. “Intentions: Conversations, Experiences and Knowledge.” Royal College of Art. https://www.rca.ac.uk/news-and-events/events/intentions-conversations-experiences-and-knowledge/. Accessed March 11, 2018.

Bruno, G. Public Intimacy: Architecture and the Visual Arts. Writing Architecture Series. MIT Press. Cambridge, Mass. 2007.

Doherty, C., ed. Situation. Whitechapel, Documents of Contemporary Art. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA. 2009.

Feldman, B. 2017 “Without Net Neutrality, What Happens to My Netflix?”. http://nymag.com/selectall/2017/11/what-happens-to-netflix-when-net-neutrality-is-gone.html. (18th March 2018)

Flood, R.; New Museum (New York, N.Y.), eds. Unmonumental: The Object in the 21st Century. Phaidon; New Museum. London, New York. 2007.

Catlow, R.; Garrett m. 2006. “DIWO (Do It With Others).” http://furtherfield.org/projects/diwo-do-it-others-resource. (18th March 2018)

Groys, B. Going Public. E-Flux Journal 3. Sternberg Press. Berlin. 2010.

Gregg, M.; Seigworth G. J. eds. The Affect Theory Reader. Duke University Press, Durham, NC. 2010.

Johnstone, S. ed. The Everyday. Documents of Contemporary Art. MIT Press, Mass. 2008.

Krauss, R. “Sculpture in the Expanded Field.” October 8 (1979): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/778224. Accessed March 18, 2018

Kristeva, J. “The Melancholic Imaginary.” New Formations, no. 3: Travelling Theories (Winter 1987).

Lefebvre, H. The Urban Revolution. U of Minnesota Press. 2003.

Massey, D.B. For Space. SAGE, London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif. 2005.

Massey, D. B. Space, Place and Gender. Repr. Polity Press, Cambridge. 2007.

Mullins, C. Rachel Whiteread. Tate Gallery Publishing Ltd, London. 2017.

Poster, M. The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Reprinted. Polity Press, Cambridge. 2004.

Price, S. “Dispersion.” NET ART ANTHOLOGY: Dispersion, October 27, 2016. https://anthology.rhizome.org/dispersion. (First published in 1998.) (Accessed February 14, 2018

Rancière, J.; Corcoran, S. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. Continuum, London; New York. 2010. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10427317. Accessed March 18, 2018

Rosler, M.; Squibb, S. Culture Class. E-Flux Journal 7. Sternberg Press, Berlin. 2013.

Rugg, J. Exploring Site-Specific Art: Issues of Space and Internationalism. London: I. B. Tauris, 2010.

Saper, C. J. Networked Art. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. 2001.

Snow, M. “Wavelength.” http://canyoncinema.com/catalog/film/?i=2142snow. Accessed June 7, 2017.

Snow, M. “One Second in Montreal.” http://canyoncinema.com/catalog/film/?i=2136. Accessed June 7, 2017.

Szoke, D. “Donna Szoke » Invisible Histories.” http://donnaszoke.com/?projects=invisible-histories. Accessed December 16, 2016.

Taussig, M. T. Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses. Routledge, New York. 1993.

Tschumi, B. “Advertisements for Architecture 1976-1977.”. http://www.tschumi.com/projects/19/. Accessed February 14, 2018

Velden, D. van der.; Kruk V.; Kushinski A. 2013 “Captives of the Cloud, Part III: All Tomorrow’s Clouds - Journal #50 December 2013 - e-Flux.” 2016. http://www.e-flux.com/journal/50/59988/captives-of-the-cloud-part-iii-all-tomorrow-s-clouds/. Accessed March 18, 2018




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35522/eed.v27i2.726

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Karen Bosy

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Revista Estudos em Design, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, ISSN Impresso: 0104-4249, ISSN Eletrônico: 1983-196X

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.