Designing Programmable Toy’s Interfaces for Small Children

Cesar Pereira Viana, André Raabe, Cassiano Pereira Viana

Resumo


Programmable toys seek to help children in their first contacts with algorithms and facilitate the development of Computational Thinking. This article examines programmable toy interfaces and describes the design process for three programming interfaces for RoPE (Educational Programmable Robot). The first interface targets children aged from 3 to 6 years old and have colorful physical buttons. The second interface is a smartphone app that allows programming by fitting blocks and keeps the sync with the physical buttons of the toy. Finally, the third is a tangible block interface, designed to allow natural interaction and collaboration. A quantitative evaluation of the application showed that the use of physical buttons is more efficient than dragging blocks on a smartphone screen. We evaluated qualitatively the tangible interface through video and content analysis. The analysis shows that children often read the tangible blocks, which encouraged the debugging of an algorithm and collaboration between students.


Palavras-chave


Programmable Toys, Computational Thinking, Programming Interfaces

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


BBC LEARNING. What is computational thinking? - Introduction to computational thinking - KS3 Computer Science Revision. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 29 maio. 2020.

BIELE, Cezary et al. How Might Voice Assistants Raise Our Children? (W. Karwowski, T. Ahram, Eds.)Intelligent Human Systems Integration 2019. Anais...: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing.Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019

BRACKMANN, Christian Puhlmann. Desenvolvimento do Pensamento Computacional Através de Atividades Desplugadas na Educação Básica. Tese—Porto Alegre, BR-RS: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2017.

BRENNAN, Karen; RESNICK, Mitchel. New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. p. 25, 2012.

BURLESON, Winslow S. et al. Active Learning Environments with Robotic Tangibles: Children’s Physical and Virtual Spatial Programming Experiences. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, v. 11, n. 1, p. 96–106, 1 jan. 2018.

CATLIN, Dave et al. EduRobot’s Taxonomy and Papert’s Paradigm. Vilnius, Lithuania: [s.n.].

ELO, Satu; KYNGÄS, Helvi. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, v. 62, n. 1, p. 107–115, 2008.

FLANNERY, Louise P. et al. Designing ScratchJr: support for early childhood learning through computer programming. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC ’13. Anais... In: THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE. New York, New York: ACM Press, 2013Disponível em: . Acesso em: 26 mar. 2020

FRASER, N. Ten things we’ve learned from Blockly. 2015 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (Blocks and Beyond). Anais... In: 2015 IEEE BLOCKS AND BEYOND WORKSHOP (BLOCKS AND BEYOND). out. 2015

HAMILTON, Megan et al. An Emerging Technology Report on Computational Toys in Early Childhood. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, v. 25, n. 1, p. 213–224, mar. 2020.

HORN, Michael; BERS, Marina. Tangible Computing. In: FINCHER, S. A.; ROBINS, A. V. (Eds.). . The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research. 1. ed. [s.l.] Cambridge University Press, 2019. p. 663–678.

HORN, Michael S. et al. Comparing the use of tangible and graphical programming languages for informal science education. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI 09. Anais... In: THE SIGCHI CONFERENCE. Boston, MA, USA: ACM Press, 2009Disponível em: . Acesso em: 1 jun. 2019

HORN, Michael S.; CROUSER, R. Jordan; BERS, Marina U. Tangible interaction and learning: the case for a hybrid approach. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, v. 16, n. 4, p. 379–389, abr. 2012.

HSU, Yu-Chang; IRIE, Natalie Roote; CHING, Yu-Hui. Computational Thinking Educational Policy Initiatives (CTEPI) Across the Globe. TechTrends, v. 63, n. 3, p. 260–270, maio 2019.

LANDY, Sarah. Pathways to competence: Encouraging healthy social and emotional development in young children, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD, US: Paul H Brookes Publishing, 2009. p. xxvi, 640

MCNERNEY, TimothyS. From turtles to Tangible Programming Bricks: explorations in physical language design. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, v. 8, n. 5, set. 2004.

NACHER, Vicente et al. Multi-touch gestures for pre-kindergarten children. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v. 73, p. 37–51, jan. 2015.

PIAGET, Jean; INHELDER, Bärbel. A representação do espaço na criança. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas, 1948.

PLOWMAN, L.; LUCKIN, R. Interactivity, interfaces, and smart toys. Computer, v. 37, n. 2, p. 98–100, fev. 2004.

REIS, Alessandro Vieira dos; GONÇALVES, Berenice dos Santos. Interfaces Tangíveis: Conceituação e Avaliação. Estudos em Design, v. 24, n. 2, p. 92–111, 2016.

RIEDO, Fanny et al. A Two Years Informal Learning Experience Using the Thymio Robot. In: RÜCKERT, U.; JOAQUIN, S.; FELIX, W. (Eds.). . Advances in Autonomous Mini Robots. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. p. 37–48.

ROQUE, Ricarose Vallarta. OpenBlocks: An Extendable Framework for Graphical Block Programming Systems. Dissertation—Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007.

SAPOUNIDIS, Theodosios et al. Tangible and graphical programming with experienced children: A mixed methods analysis. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, v. 19, p. 67–78, 2019.

SAPOUNIDIS, Theodosios; DEMETRIADIS, Stavros; STAMELOS, Ioannis. Evaluating children performance with graphical and tangible robot programming tools. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, v. 19, n. 1, p. 225–237, 2015.

SHELLEY, Mack; KRIPPENDORFF, Klaus. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Journal of the American Statistical Association, v. 79, n. 385, p. 240, mar. 1984.

TANG, Kai-Yu; CHOU, Te-Lien; TSAI, Chin-Chung. A Content Analysis of Computational Thinking Research: An International Publication Trends and Research Typology. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, v. 29, n. 1, p. 9–19, fev. 2020.

VENDRAMINI, Louise Clarissa; HEEMANN, Adriano. O papel dos gestos na interação designer-usuário. Estudos em Design, v. 25, n. 1, p. 18, 2020.

YU, Junnan; ROQUE, Ricarose. A review of computational toys and kits for young children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, v. 21, p. 17–36, set. 2019.

ZUCKERMAN, Oren; GAL-OZ, Ayelet. To TUI or not to TUI: Evaluating performance and preference in tangible vs. graphical user interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v. 71, n. 7–8, p. 803–820, jul. 2013.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35522/eed.v29i1.1150

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Direitos autorais 2021 Cesar Pereira Viana, André Raabe, Cassiano Pereira Viana

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição - NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.

Revista Estudos em Design, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, ISSN Impresso: 0104-4249, ISSN Eletrônico: 1983-196X

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.